When I first heard about this paradox, I was really confused. When I understood, this confusion did not go away. I like to hear and read such things. As for this paradox, of course, I wonder what I would do. But since I'm a person who doesn't like to take risks, I would probably choose the one that's guaranteed.

Get two rooms. There are a hundred boxes in both rooms. Let there be a thousand dollars in ninety-nine of a hundred boxes in the first room, and a million thousand dollars in a box. One million dollars each in ninety-nine of a hundred boxes in the second chamber, and one box is empty. we have the right to get a single box from either the first room or the second room. Which room do we get from? As we have seen, our experiment has nothing to do with the paradox of determinism and free will. the only parameter in the experiment is the amount of money. the choice is all about the attitude of the person between the risk and benefit expectation and the character of the person. The person's choice may even be not to gamble at all. the question is actually "if I gave you a full ticket money would you buy one full ticket in the national lottery, would you buy four quarter tickets for the same money?" is the same question as the question.

In philosophy and mathematics, Newcomb's paradox, also referred to as Newcomb's problem, is a thought experiment involving a game between two players, one of whom can predict the future. Newcomb's paradox was created by William Newcomb of the University of California Lawrence Livermore Laboratory.


  • /1